The OSI value, was significantly lower in the aspherical lens group compared with the spherical lens.

CONCLUSION: Aspherical IOLs does not significantly affect visual acuity compared with spherical IOLs. All time points varied significantly (P<0.01 between the two groups. There was a negative linear correction between the OSI value and BCVA (r=-0.634, P=0.000, and positive corrections between the OSI value and the lens LOCUS III value of nucleus color (NC, nucleus opacity (NO, cortex (C and posterior lens capsular (P (r=0.704, P=0.000 r=0.514, P=0.000 r=0.276, P=0.020 r=0.417, P=0.000, respectively. UNVA was better in group 1 than that in groups 2 and 3 (p 0.05 before and after spherical and aspheric lens implantation. There was no significant difference in the mean uncorrected intermediate and best corrected distance visual acuities between the groups. Patients in group 2 had statistically significant increase in UDVA than that in group 1 (p = 0.037. Furthermore, independence from glasses and presence of optical phenomena were assessed. Six months postoperatively, uncorrected/corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA/CDVA, uncorrected intermediate (60 cm and near (35 cm visual acuity (UNVA, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, and a quality-of-life questionnaire were evaluated. Patients with multifocal IOL were closely matched for age, sex, and ocular findings with patients who had monofocal IOL implantation. Overall, 34 patients received SN6AD1 multifocal (group 1, 48 eyes, 19 patients received Akreos ГђВђГђЕѕ monofocal aspheric (group 2, 30 eyes, and 13 patients received AcrySof SA60AГђВў monofocal spherical (group 3, 18 eyes IOL. To compare visual function and satisfaction in patients after implantation of AcrySof ReSTOR SN6AD1 multifocal intraocular lens (IOL, AcrySof SA60AГђВў spherical monofocal IOL, or Akreos ГђВђГђЕѕ aspheric monofocal IOL during cataract surgery. All IOLs provided an excellent high and low contrasts vision, the multifocal IOL was as good as the spheric and aspheric monofocal IOLs.Objetivo: Comparar a sensibilidade ao contraste e anГѓВЎlise de 'wavefront' com OPD-scan em pacientes submetidos a cirurgia de facoemulsificaД¬omparison of visual function and patient satisfaction with AcrySof ReSTORSN6AD1 multifocal intraocular compared to monofocal intraocular lenses 5ДЇull Text Available Aim. Conclusion: In all analyzed parameters of OPD-scan aberrometry the aspheric and the multifocal IOLs provided less total and spherical aberrations than spheric IOLs. The SN60D3 group had low contrast sensitivity performed under mesopic conditions (KW = 10.79 p=0,0045 in 6cpd spatial frequency compared to the SN60AT group (p=0.011 and to the SN60WF group (p=0.007 with statistical significant differences. The SN60D3 group compared to SN60AT group (p=0.016 had low contrast sensitivity (log units with statistical difference in 6.0 cpd (KW = 7.84 p=0.0199, but no statistical difference between SN60WF and SN60AT group (p=0.91 and SN60WF and SN60D3 group (p=0.051. No significant differences were found between groups in far-distance VA measured using ETDRS at 100% and 9% contrast. The SN60AT group (KW = 16.20 p=0.0003 showed with high spherical aberration values compared to the SN60WF (p=0.00046 and SN60D3 (p=0.0014 group. Results: Statistically significant differences were detected more total aberration in SN60AT group (KW = 9.42 p=0.009 when compared to SN60D3 group (p=0.016 and SN60WF group (p=0.0047. All patients was tested with the OPD-scan aberrometer, ETDRS chart at 100% and 9% contrasts and contrast sensitivity. They were closely paired in age, sex, pre-operative wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity. Methods: Thirty-two eyes received the multifocal IOL, 32 eyes received the spheric monofocal IOL and 32 eyes received the aspheric monofocal IOL. Comparison between OPD-scan results and contrast sensitivity of three intraocular lenses: spheric AcrySof SN60AT, aspheric AcrySof SN60WF and multifocal AcrySof Restor lens Estudo comparativo da anГѓВЎlise de frente de onda e sensibilidade ao contraste entre as lentes intra-oculares multifocal AcrySof Restor SN60D3, monofocal AcrySof SN60WF asfГѓВ©rica e a monofocal SN60AT esfГѓВ©ricaДirectory of Open Access Journals (Sweden)ДЇull Text Available Purpose: Compare the OPD-scan results and the contrast sensitivity in patients who had implantation of the AcrySof SN60D3 multifocal IOL, the AcrySof SA60AT spheric monofocal IOL and the AcrySof SN60AT aspheric monofocal IOL.

Unfolder for the ar40e